{"id":2690,"date":"2023-04-30T15:44:00","date_gmt":"2023-04-30T18:44:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.blog2.com.ar\/?p=2690"},"modified":"2023-05-08T16:30:03","modified_gmt":"2023-05-08T19:30:03","slug":"judgment-in-engineering-philosophical-discussions-and-pedagogical-opportunities","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.blog2.com.ar\/index.php\/2023\/04\/30\/judgment-in-engineering-philosophical-discussions-and-pedagogical-opportunities\/","title":{"rendered":"Judgment in Engineering Philosophical Discussions and Pedagogical Opportunities"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Como suele advertir Gustavo Giuliano, hay poca epistemolog\u00eda de la ingenier\u00eda<\/strong>. Mucho menos a\u00fan una relaci\u00f3n fuerte entre la Filosof\u00eda de la Tecnolog\u00eda y los marcos de la racionalidad ingenieril que se construyen en las aulas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

De hecho, no solo hay una falta en cuestiones de profundidad en los temas espec\u00edficos de la ingenier\u00eda sino tambi\u00e9n una falta que es de toda una sociedad: falta Cultura Tecnol\u00f3gica<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

El lugar de su construcci\u00f3n por excelencia es la escuela, como lo es en la construcci\u00f3n de ciudadan\u00eda o en la cultura general. Sospecho que la Cultura Tecnol\u00f3gica es simplemente otra v\u00edctima m\u00e1s de la pereza cr\u00edtica frente a las bondades instrumentales de las tecnolog\u00edas<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sobre este diagn\u00f3stico simplificado, la C\u00e1tedra de Introducci\u00f3n a la Ingenier\u00eda de la UCA<\/a> mantiene una mirada reflexiva que busca integrar la profesi\u00f3n desde un eje claramente profesional con otro eje m\u00e1s contextual, y para lograrlo transita a fil\u00f3sofos, escritores, ingenieros, tecn\u00f3logos, educadores, etc. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Algunos miembros de la C\u00e1tedra somos coautores de este cap\u00edtulo que abre una cuesti\u00f3n casi inadvertida en la literatura acad\u00e9mica: el “buen juicio” en ingenier\u00eda<\/strong>. Este concepto es tomado por las definiciones can\u00f3nicas del ingeniero en buena parte de Occidente e inspira parte del dise\u00f1o curricular de la carrera. Sin embargo, hemos sido pioneros en plantear que no hay un concepto claro al que se refiere el “buen juicio”.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

De este aspecto trata el cap\u00edtulo<\/a> que ya ha tenido excelente repercusi\u00f3n y que permite trazar caminos de integraci\u00f3n con muchas otras disciplinas que iluminan la complejidad de trabajo de dise\u00f1o de cualquier ingeniero, y sus condicionantes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>
\n

The aim of this work is to lay a foundation for discussion on the importance of philosophy in professional training sustained in the mainstream definition of engineering provided by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). Such definition states that specific engineering knowledge is applied \u2018with judgment\u2019 by engineers. The particle \u2018with judgment\u2019 officiates as a link between epistemological aspects associated with knowledge, and pragmatic aspects referring to the purposes that such knowledge should have. In this work we will provide a formal definition of \u2018judgment\u2019 in order to enlighten the conceptual links between choosing courses of action, rationality and critical thinking in the context of the engineering profession. In doing so we point out the relevance of including philosophical formation in engineering training. It is important that the engineer, by means of the adequate study of humanities, develops the groundwork for critical thinking such that will enable them to identify, select or create a rational system with cultural criteria directed towards the \u2018benefit of humanity\u2019, while being able to justify their actions using paradigms that go beyond mere technique. Finally, we present a pedagogical approach called \u2018kite model\u2019 that allows us to put these ideas into practice in the classroom.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Link al cap\u00edtulo<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

H\u00e9ctor Gustavo Giuliano<\/a>, Leandro Ariel Giri<\/a>, Fernando Gabriel Nicchi<\/a>, Walter Mario Weyerstall<\/a>, Lydia Fabiana Ferreira Aicardi<\/a>, Mart\u00edn Parselis<\/a> & Sergio Mers\u00e9<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

El cap\u00edtulo trata sobre el buen juicio en el dise\u00f1o: y permite trazar caminos de integraci\u00f3n con muchas otras disciplinas que iluminan la complejidad de trabajo de dise\u00f1o de cualquier ingeniero, y sus condicionantes.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":2692,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[86],"tags":[251,1357,1352,385,1310,1178,754],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.blog2.com.ar\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2690"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.blog2.com.ar\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.blog2.com.ar\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.blog2.com.ar\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.blog2.com.ar\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2690"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"http:\/\/www.blog2.com.ar\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2690\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2700,"href":"http:\/\/www.blog2.com.ar\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2690\/revisions\/2700"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.blog2.com.ar\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2692"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.blog2.com.ar\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2690"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.blog2.com.ar\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2690"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.blog2.com.ar\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2690"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}